<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux Ethernet Bonding Configuration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html</link>
	<description>Debian/Ubuntu Linux System Administration Tutorials,Howtos,Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 02:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas Schuldei</title>
		<link>http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html/comment-page-1#comment-8777</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Schuldei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html#comment-8777</guid>
		<description>Regarding the bug in squeeze that tom mentions: i checked with the debian maintainer of the module-init-tools package. he had not heared about that bug, and reports that he himself runs bonded interfaces on squeeze without problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the bug in squeeze that tom mentions: i checked with the debian maintainer of the module-init-tools package. he had not heared about that bug, and reports that he himself runs bonded interfaces on squeeze without problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pere Cerdan</title>
		<link>http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html/comment-page-1#comment-8697</link>
		<dc:creator>Pere Cerdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 07:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html#comment-8697</guid>
		<description>There is a bug in some 2.6.26 and 2.6.32 kernels with bonding driver. I found it in Xen kernels.

If you want two bond interfaces the option:  modprobe bonding max_bonds=2 
does not work

Instead of 2 intrerfaces 3 or 4 it works! i.e:   modprobe bonding max_bonds=3

Its an annoying bug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a bug in some 2.6.26 and 2.6.32 kernels with bonding driver. I found it in Xen kernels.</p>
<p>If you want two bond interfaces the option:  modprobe bonding max_bonds=2<br />
does not work</p>
<p>Instead of 2 intrerfaces 3 or 4 it works! i.e:   modprobe bonding max_bonds=3</p>
<p>Its an annoying bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html/comment-page-1#comment-4890</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 09:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html#comment-4890</guid>
		<description>There is a bug in Debian Squeeze which cause bonding not to boot up.
module-init-tools package is buggy, do not upgrade Lenny to Squeeze if You use bonding until this bug is fixed.

Currently, I&#039;m building a test beowulf cluster in virtual environment just for my college lesson. Squeeze was needed becouse other bug (in kernel-package) caused that I was unable to build my own kernel.

I used sucessfuly bonding before on:
Debian Etch - just for load balancing 2 x 100Mbit cards in two machines hosting Samba and service tools
Debian Lenny - for LAN interface for double speed (2x1Gbps) in a routing server (it&#039;s a gateway for LAN). I have static routes.
Ausidada: I&#039;m working on same problem. Have to recompile kernel with &quot;dead gateway detection&quot; and routing patches. Next have to create static tables. There is no way to create backup for ISP using bonding. It&#039;s good for connection beteween servers or for LAN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a bug in Debian Squeeze which cause bonding not to boot up.<br />
module-init-tools package is buggy, do not upgrade Lenny to Squeeze if You use bonding until this bug is fixed.</p>
<p>Currently, I&#8217;m building a test beowulf cluster in virtual environment just for my college lesson. Squeeze was needed becouse other bug (in kernel-package) caused that I was unable to build my own kernel.</p>
<p>I used sucessfuly bonding before on:<br />
Debian Etch - just for load balancing 2 x 100Mbit cards in two machines hosting Samba and service tools<br />
Debian Lenny - for LAN interface for double speed (2x1Gbps) in a routing server (it&#8217;s a gateway for LAN). I have static routes.<br />
Ausidada: I&#8217;m working on same problem. Have to recompile kernel with &#8220;dead gateway detection&#8221; and routing patches. Next have to create static tables. There is no way to create backup for ISP using bonding. It&#8217;s good for connection beteween servers or for LAN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eol</title>
		<link>http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html/comment-page-1#comment-4500</link>
		<dc:creator>Eol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html#comment-4500</guid>
		<description>ow do I create backup bonding between NIC1 &amp; NIC2 for gateway 
Forget it. In real world you can&#039;t do this. You need to use dynamic routing or floating static routes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ow do I create backup bonding between NIC1 &amp; NIC2 for gateway<br />
Forget it. In real world you can&#8217;t do this. You need to use dynamic routing or floating static routes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ausidada</title>
		<link>http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html/comment-page-1#comment-4390</link>
		<dc:creator>ausidada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html#comment-4390</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I have NIC0 (local network), NIC1 (ISP provider 1) and NIC2 (ISP provider 2 - for backup), how do I create backup bonding between NIC1 &amp; NIC2 for gateway. Any help on this will be much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I have NIC0 (local network), NIC1 (ISP provider 1) and NIC2 (ISP provider 2 - for backup), how do I create backup bonding between NIC1 &amp; NIC2 for gateway. Any help on this will be much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcos Dione</title>
		<link>http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html/comment-page-1#comment-3212</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcos Dione</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html#comment-3212</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;Antoniu-George SAVU&quot;&gt;
I want to create two separate bonding devices with two slaves each
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The default max bonding device is 1. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:Bonding&quot; title=&quot;the module&#039;s doc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;. Try setting it to 2 or more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="Antoniu-George SAVU"><p>
I want to create two separate bonding devices with two slaves each
</p></blockquote>
<p>The default max bonding device is 1. See <a href="http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:Bonding" title="the module's doc" rel="nofollow">. Try setting it to 2 or more.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques</title>
		<link>http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html/comment-page-1#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Can you provide an example of /etc/network/interfaces with two IP addresses on the same bonding interface ?
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you provide an example of /etc/network/interfaces with two IP addresses on the same bonding interface ?<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legmig</title>
		<link>http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html/comment-page-1#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>legmig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html#comment-185</guid>
		<description>And I have need for an active failover bond consisting of two load balanced bonds. I fear bonding only supports enslaving of &quot;real&quot; eth interfaces, though. Has anobody tried that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I have need for an active failover bond consisting of two load balanced bonds. I fear bonding only supports enslaving of &#8220;real&#8221; eth interfaces, though. Has anobody tried that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoniu-George SAVU</title>
		<link>http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html/comment-page-1#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoniu-George SAVU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debianadmin.com/linux-ethernet-bonding-configuration.html#comment-184</guid>
		<description>This howto is incomplete. What if I have 4 NICs and I want to create two separate bonding devices with two slaves each ?

As far as I have tried, I manage to get the bond0 interface up but I can not get bond1 up using /etc/network/interfaces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This howto is incomplete. What if I have 4 NICs and I want to create two separate bonding devices with two slaves each ?</p>
<p>As far as I have tried, I manage to get the bond0 interface up but I can not get bond1 up using /etc/network/interfaces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

