<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fix for weak OpenSSL/OpenSSH keys in Debian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.debianadmin.com/fix-for-weak-opensslopenssh-keys-in-debian.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.debianadmin.com/fix-for-weak-opensslopenssh-keys-in-debian.html</link>
	<description>Debian/Ubuntu Linux System Administration Tutorials,Howtos,Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:24:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.debianadmin.com/fix-for-weak-opensslopenssh-keys-in-debian.html/comment-page-1#comment-2038</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 12:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debianadmin.com/fix-for-weak-opensslopenssh-keys-in-debian.html#comment-2038</guid>
		<description>what about ssl certificates?
i understand that x509 authorization, vpn and similar stuff with vulnerable certificates is a problem, but what about usual daemons like apache2, postfix with ssl encryption?

if those two has vulnerable certificates is it still a problem/threat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about ssl certificates?<br />
i understand that x509 authorization, vpn and similar stuff with vulnerable certificates is a problem, but what about usual daemons like apache2, postfix with ssl encryption?</p>
<p>if those two has vulnerable certificates is it still a problem/threat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
