Comments on: Activate NAT on Debian etch and Disable IPv6 support on Debian http://www.debianadmin.com/activate-nat-on-debian-etch-and-disable-ipv6-support-on-debian.html Debian/Ubuntu Linux System Administration Tutorials,Howtos,Tips Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:24:32 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: kajax http://www.debianadmin.com/activate-nat-on-debian-etch-and-disable-ipv6-support-on-debian.html/comment-page-1#comment-2919 kajax Tue, 12 May 2009 10:31:49 +0000 http://www.debianadmin.com/activate-nat-on-debian-etch-and-disable-ipv6-support-on-debian.html#comment-2919 Yes, obviously! You are absolutely right! Yes, obviously! You are absolutely right!

]]> By: Michael G http://www.debianadmin.com/activate-nat-on-debian-etch-and-disable-ipv6-support-on-debian.html/comment-page-1#comment-69 Michael G Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:05:45 +0000 http://www.debianadmin.com/activate-nat-on-debian-etch-and-disable-ipv6-support-on-debian.html#comment-69 auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.1.254 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 192.168.1.255 up iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $IFACE -j MASQUERADE Probably a silly thing, but is not the network line here mixed up with the broadcast address? Should it not say something like this: broadcast 192.168.1.255 network 192.168.1.0 auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.1.254
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.1.255
up iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $IFACE -j MASQUERADE

Probably a silly thing, but is not the network line here mixed up with the broadcast address? Should it not say something like this:

broadcast 192.168.1.255
network 192.168.1.0

]]>